The Biggest (But Lesser Known) Online Marketing Myths « Datadial Blog
0208 6000 500

Matt

December 16th, 2009.


Filed under Online Marketing

The Biggest (But Lesser Known) Online Marketing Myths

Recently I seem to be coming across a lot of popular misconceptions being churned out, both by business owners who have unfortunately been told or have read incorrect information, or even, and more worryingly; people who write about digital marketing or SEO in the mainstream or industry press. Below is a collection of my favourite online marketing myths, feel free to add your own in the comments.

Content is king

Yes, it is correct that all websites need good content, and ideally need good content being added on a regular basis. However the “content is king” mantra seems to have misled people into thinking that ALL you need to do for your marketing effort is to add what you consider to be good content. Content needs to be optimised, content needs to be linkable, content needs to be publicised, content needs to be linked to. Lots of great content remains ignored and unranked as it is passed over for more mediocre but better publicised and linked-to alternatives.

Build Multiple Sites

You have one website that’s doing very well, if you add another you’ll double that success. Add 10 new sites and you’ll be retiring in the next 12 months right? Wrong. Ten more sites will mean 10 times the marketing effort and budget, and ten times the cost. Having one site with 1000 pages of content on it with 1000 links will perform far better than the same content and links divided between two sites.
By consolidating content and links onto one domain you will increase that domains trust and authority, which will mean it’ll rank far higher than it would if the resources were split across two properties.
The only time I would advocate building more than one site is for strategic business reasons such as a planned sell-off. If you are running several sites for no particular reason, other than it seemed like a good idea I would certainly look at consolodating them.

E-Mail Marketing Is Spam

Spam is bad mmmkay? Don’t do it. EMail Marketing to an opt-in list that you have built as part of your brand will deliver a massive return on investment. Every company should be building, collating, segmenting and marketing to your customer data, it is a tremendously valuable resource. Avoid emailing people too often, and for heavens sake keep it interesting, useful and punchy.

All Sites Are Equal

Certainly in an SEO sense this isn’t the case. You’ll find that bigger brands can get away with a lot more than tiny start-ups. Older, more trusted domains with a higher authority can get away with using far more spammy tactics that would get smaller sites penalised. Google hasn’t exactly levelled the playing field with the Google brand update, which is rumoured to give big brands a rankings boost for certain commercial keywords.

Social Media Is A Fad

The rocket-like growth of social media sites has taken many people by surprise, online marketers, brands and PR agencies included. People react to change in different ways, some labelling the growth as a fad, something to be ignored. Others learn and adapt and have made millions in the process.
Social media is a fundamental shift in the way people communicate, used correctly it is a cost effective way of reaching brand advocates, consumers and influencers. Just because you haven’t worked out the best way of using, tracking, measuring and monetising social media for your brand doesn’t mean it’s not worth the time.

Rankings And Traffic Are Your Most Important Metrics

Checking your sites rankings is fine, and it’s a good idea to keep a close eye on your traffic numbers, but are these your most important metrics? Probably not. SEOs and online marketers in my opinion spend far too long obsessing over rankings and traffic numbers, and less time learning about conversion rates, segmenting visitor sources, looking at link acquisition rates, keyword £ values and ultimately sales volumes. Not many clients will tell you they value visitor numbers over money in their pocket.

Search Engine Submission

No, just no. If anyone tells you that you need to submit your site to a search engine give them a sharp poke in the eye. Search engines have gone far beyond having to be told where sites are located and are quite capable of finding them themselves through links. It’s been this way since the 1990’s but the myth just won’t go away.

Magic Page Keyword Density

I keep hearing the same question asked time and time again about what the optimum page keyword density is. There certainly isn’t a magic mathematical formula for keyword % that will give you any kind of boost over your competitors.
It’s far more important to write for your visitors and intelligently use your keywords in certain places on the page – sure it’s logical that they should be present in the body text, but search engines will attribute a far higher weight to words mentioned in places like the page titles, image alt tags, headings, bold and italic text etc.

Flash Sites

There are a huge number of misconceptions about flash websites. Can search engines read them or not? On the whole, now yes they can, text and links can be read, with the exception of some JavaScript links. Until 2008 this wasn’t always the case, with most flash sites being all but invisible to search engines.
So is now the time to rush-off and convert your site to flash because it looks so lovely? Probably not. There are still many fundamental reasons why flash sites don’t perform as well in search engines as their HTML cousins. Problems with page mark-up, content not being on unique URLs, and doubts over crawlability all don’t lend flash sites to ranking well in search engines.

6 comments on The Biggest (But Lesser Known) Online Marketing Myths

  1. Simon says:

    Seriously cool article… :)

  2. Loft Master says:

    Nice article and good advice. Certainly agree that conversion rates and building links are more important than looking at the stats all day long. Mind you though, its always good fun looking at the stats and I find its sometimes nice to have a break from all that hard work and do something fun.

  3. Zack says:

    Yep, agree to all of it. That’s funny you mentioned “content is king.” Lately I’ve seen a lot of posts on “other” blogs that tout that good content will bring traffic. With today’s algorithms, it’s just not the case. Content is no good without inbound links.

  4. Jen says:

    Great post, I actually nodded a few times. Way to kick it off w/ #1. I couldn’t agree more. Content on a site that nobody reads is king of absolutely nothing. Simply HAVING content doesn’t make it linkable. And just having links to content doesn’t automatically make it great.

    Agreed on the metrics point as well, I mean just look at “real life”. Stores go out of business in popular malls all the time, just having a lot of traffic is meaningless if no one is buying…

  5. And though this article has been published not so long time ago, I disagree with the last point concerning Flash sites. No, no, It’s a BIG myth that search engine doesn’t see Flash site.
    But I’m disagree with this:
    > “Problems with page mark-up, content not being on unique URLs, and doubts over crawlability all don’t lend flash sites to ranking well in search engines.”

    (!) Now each page of flash website may have its own unique URL. Most professional Flash websites has two versions:
    – Flash version (seen by users);
    – HTML version (seen by search engines and users who don’t have Flash player).

  6. New York Internet Marketing says:

    I am definitely a fan that content refresh is king. & absolutely submitting to search engines is a waste of time and money.

Leave a comment

Recent Posts »

Our work »

What we do »

Who we work with »

Got Questions? Lets Talk »